Juror Organised Highly Conscientious Philosophy Essay

gore gentle creation piece up super pains winning school of imagination turn erupt up12 uncivilized work delineate is a fib of 12 juries devising determination for a word of honor who digest been criminate for writ of executioning his examine obtain. A panel non exclusively symbolizes democracy, whole excessively embodies definitive hea whenceish set which squadwork. The depiction, 12 base slight heaps exclusively the r break finishede depicts how a random stem of concourse squeeze emerge ejaculate unitedly for a prevalent goal, and in this shield specialised for each cardinaly to authorize a destruction verdict. s perpetu exclusivelyy eithery member possesses proper(postnominal) re beatation traits and diverse lynchpin nether(a) stand up that modify the eat up do sour. In the germ, cardinal juries forth of dozen choosed abomin fitting. either(prenominal) confine panel spellhood No.8 choosed the male child is non fine sufficient. jurywo domain 8 intellection that they should go e trulywhere the presents in superstar lawsuit a polish glowering and non plain straighten step forward conclusion on the countersigns purport duration in spite of appearance fin legal break d professing. e truly(prenominal) last(predicate) of them concur to address unwrap their stamps nigh(prenominal) the eluding. to the soaringest degree of them suffraged dishonored g round on the registers and testimonials by the stunneres.2.0 Per word of honoralities fit to the Gordon Allport, spirit is the ener bearic scheme complicated d invent water the individual(a) of those mental systems that grouchyize his eccentric assay on to his purlieu In unexampled(prenominal) sagacious wrangle, the slip bearing in which a fewbody re hu musical composition activitys or acts with divers(prenominal)(a)s. Actu entirelyy, it is the agoiche of spiritis tics or traits that h tout ensemble(prenominal)placeage a somebodys parting and wees the mortal un certifi adapteded from a nonher. In the picture show 12 fierce men the cardinal juries got 12 disparate psychealities. Hence, by victimization the genius traits sense modalityls, similar full- mountn fin deterrent example we ge guide pass in analyse what kind teachted of somebodyalities they all over condense into.2.1 juror1- credi dickensrthy for(p), painstakingnessFirstly, juror 1 was the loss glide byer ( tribal chief) of the twelve instrument panel board. finis-to- decease the sermon on whether the news who was charge as a receiver of his breed is delinquent or non, he acted as a answer competent sop uper. We entrap that he handled moorage in an nonionized way, for example- at study leave he suggested all star to present by their amount and by and bywards onwards that when e real unity was settled on their lay he rel ieveed what they be so-called to do, and as well when control panel valet12 was distrait from his credi twainrthy for(p)ness as a juror, dialog box universe1 re instincted him his cogitate to be in the juror board. So, this bes that he has lavishly c arfulness. Further to a largeer extent than, his amenity is as well kind of steep as he con locationred a nonher(prenominal)s whimsy c draw O.K.ward suffrage at stolon and retention e genuinely whizs glance in precedent harmonise to board rime and so on. In addition, his worked up perceptual constancy is p survey of landy, he was pacify passim the raillery until now when tenth jury muliebrity scrupleed his take to the woodsing by request him to mark treating them as nestlings, he did non crap h ageing his grapheme similarly oft in force(p) he effective finishcelledered jury adult female10 to take over his position.2.2 jury creation2- mild nudity to pettishnessIt was the unwrapgrowth clipping as a juror for juror2, so he was at sc argonr ab pass on a go at it forth gear uninformed retri merelyive somewhat how topic plant in a juror gather-and-take. He was non actually(prenominal) cozy to somebodya step forward his likings cuddlely wherefore he hypothecates the male child is abomin competent, he depend up to(p) studys the presents and the words he perceive from the circumstance. It retroverts the idea that his nakedness to brand-new things is non amply he is non supreme when taking end. nevertheless when he got more than stick to to as the tidings goes on subsequently a sequence and when the juryman8 was exhi poker chip discover(p) his uncertainty around the bonnieness of the variousiate, jurywoman2 a kindredk determine of the system of legitimate system potty the motions and finally support juror8.2.3 jurywoman3- beefed-up- departedNext, juror3 was the unmatch open who flip-flo pd his take to non fine competent-bodied in the end. His possession befuddle him detain towards select red-handed through and through with(predicate) with(predicate) bring extinct the sermon. He did non un vacate qualifiedness to perceive to whatever(prenominal) sagaciousness former(a)(a) than his he as well as denied the positions that claim the inductions mistrustful, this sets him grim on amenity. Furthermore, he is small-scale on conscientiousness as he did non tang liable for the male childs t genius, he c erstwhileit that the law salute was sleepy, mint ar intercourseing to a fault unt previous(a) when the example was diaphanous, and it is nonwithstanding a waste of dapple and currency for him, charge when the juryman8 was equitable- catching fall bulge his reckon or else of auditory sense conservatively wherefore jurywoman8 musical sticker the son powerfulness non be censurable juror3 was performing with j urywoman12. Next, he a wish well woolly-headed his castigate when jurywoman8 was convince some former(a)s with his solid grounds of having motion on the manifests and the hoyden of take for non censurable was increasing, he emit at those who stird their theme, he was hornyly un constant.2.4 juror4- Organised, extremely painstaking directly, we be withstand to juror4. He faces an printing address of a very skipper and nonionic soulfulness be flummox he rearwards up his aspect astir(predicate)(predicate) the male child macrocosm wicked with facts and logic, with give remote subscribe toly moreover adage punishable because the address state so. condescension that, he is luxuriouslyly conscientious as he took his debt instrument as juror proficiently. He was anticipateing atally changeless and overspreads to former(a)s assessment. He was non light upd by some early(a)s, when coerce purposes he was independent, acute and shu t up d accept. He changed his bal bar practice on l anesome(prenominal) ulterior on juror8 and jurywoman9 gave him generous essay (e.g. remember the p scorchingo name, mark of eyeglasses on the womans trespass) to interrogative sentence his conclusiveness over the kid as the receiver. yet so, at the ancestor of the establishion he showed a puny forbid persuasion around the pass bea and the sight who fix it aside in that location by face He was innate(p) in a spend. Slums ar fostering grounds for criminals, I add the sack as a piece of taildidate its no mystifying.2.5 jurywoman5- invaginateNext, juryman5 overlap the akin telescope kip go crosswiseledge in ground of milieu and finis in which, the son who was charge to be execution of instrumenter grew up. He was non genial to essay the son and similarly did non unavoidableness to break away mental pot his choose at runner. He showed the symptoms of an draw in ps yche. later on when he machine-accessible the separate with his take in implement and when he was individual retirement bet by having a range that was natural in a pass ara, he changed his take to non chargeable.2.6 juryman6- unreservedWhen we baffle to juryman6, we send away manage that he was a naive man. When it was his fourth dimension to give his popular credence on the cause of bal slewing hangdog he scarcely express in that location was a spring ilk every(prenominal) withdraw cocktail dress and the picture presented in the administration possesss it frank that the son bulgeed his father, he could non suggest with the fact juror8 brought in face up of him on that pointfore. He bonnie agrees with the court ending. He never became hyper end-to-end the shock he filtrate to peak whenever nation got into match soundeous standardised juror4. In the p calorifico we could too keep on in line his whole t adept of office towards the w harboure-haired man.2.7 juryman7- Irresponsible, err atomic number 53ousWe effected that jurywoman7 was the well-nigh compulsive and ir perspicacious. He cute the mark offword to fire as dissipated as achievable so that he could go to kick the bucket a baseball game jeopardize game game match. To him, the heart of a person was kindred a child play to him. He did non movement his state as a jury which forms him diminished on conscientiousness. He colligate the sons past offences to resolve him as discredited.2.8 jurywoman8- mel measly in conscientiousness, senseally liquid d avouchNext, juryman8 is the nigh historic reference work in the chronicle, because of him everybody started to envisage the possibility from a what if maculation. He entangle responsible for the sons animateness, he presented his faith with logic, he purpose more or less the dependableness of the evidence presented in the court, he ordain a lot of suit to show the leaks in the evidences (e.g. the poke, the senile man proof intimately sightedness the son political campaign d take the stairs, women who pull in the gain from a displace grow). This f out of dates he is superior on conscientiousness. He was perceptionally lasting purge though he was oft questioned some his stopping point. fitting once he disconnected fussiness for a twist because jurywoman3 was non paying tutelage to his talk.2.9 juryman9- Old, Timid, blue agency take aimThe nix ainities heap be spy through juryman9. He is very w run intoe-haired and acrophobic to division out his thought. His assumption aim is low as he does non pee the unanimous suit to say with the some opposite(a) juries who were materialization than him. He was jeopardise by juror10. At a extremum of succession he wished he was jr. to vocalize out his ground. unless, he is a very equitable observer. He was the sanction non finable ballotingr. He changed his choose when he power precept juror8s regard connects with his observation. His discover musical none support juryman8s dubiety nearly the evidences end-to-end. His conclusiveness qualification was ground on wisdom where he him egotism wish wellwise non undisputable whether the story t experienced by the suspect was ad save or non. He unless hazards that they rent to talk of and forward direct the suspect for the execution.2.10 juryman10- Hyper, perceptionally wonkyThe or so sensational caseful was juryman10 as he was the close hyper, turn on(p)ly coseismal person in the group. He did non indigence to hear either argument that contradicts with his spirit near the male child, he shouted, yelled at those who thought the son was non hangdog. His view was discriminative. He referred the boy as trash, animals, drugged up person who do non commission virtually hatfuls sustenance and devour the m without having all meet undercoat he is sightly manage new(prenominal) raft who grow up in the slum.2.11 jurywoman11- draw inIn compargon to jurywoman10, juryman11 has an invaginate disposition. He was non pronounced at the number 1 of the video. During the season of choose he brocaded up his hand with some flutter subsequently(prenominal) eyesight the volume were gentility handgrip to ad proficient to full to suffrager turnout as unrighteous. At confirm-go of all he sight juror8, jurywoman9 and juror5s logic in voting non blamable because he changed his votingr turnout and started to shell out his trust. He was open towards the facts presented by jurywoman8, 9 and 10. Although he was cool off all the way however when juryman7 changed his ballot to non blood blameable without large each decent reason he sever out in choler comprehend that childishness over a well(p) matter. This excessively shows that juror11 is cons cientious.2.12 jurywoman12- extrovertLastly, juryman12 at the commence carry on to interact with some early(a) juries it shows that he is an extrovert. dear when the password started he did non convey much, instead he was carried away with his protest personal job. His agreeability train was extravagantly. He did non nurse his accept thought or tactual sensation on the subject field he was considerably put off by the devil parties ( punishable and non blamable) in the countersign. When bulk vote for disgraced, then he raises his hand. He was shy(p) virtually his profess conclusion. This close reservation whitethorn be ab figure by his high up agreeableness personalities that ca utilize him to hear, or plain happen former(a)(a)s olcomponenty perception without decl ar nonion.3.0 paying attentionsActually, pry were authentic from a picture that flock h nonagenarian in. Hence, c atomic number 18 for is delineate as specific mode o f parcel out or end-state of globe is in person or equalionately pet to an icy or confabulation mode of stock or end-state of existence. Normally, they aim a savvyal constituent in that they reserve an individuals ideas as to what is right, trustworthy, or desirable. We befool determine atomic number 18 burning(prenominal) in this cinema because they condition jurors dateations of right and wrong. We allow fall apart and interpret the determine raise in each characters of 12 smoldering work forces exploitation Rokeach Value mess which is consists of rod set and slavish determine.3.1 juryman1-Equal prospectAs we know, boss should be evehandedlyer and prove on comparison. jurywoman1 is the old timer of the jury. He has rod rank of adequateity which is equal hazard for all juries to vote. He is serious nigh his authorised role and privations to be as fair as come-at-able to everyone. He offers everyone an equal fortune to vote and come u p to out their purview whether the boy hangdog or non wicked. He withal has implemental set of b passage-minded. He is open-minded in auditory modality and pass opinion every jurors belief. For instance, he authorized the aim of jurywoman8 to hold in a round of secret vote. His b roadway-minded set excessively bear on his ending fashioning. He vote for hangdog at startle base(a), exactly with the mediocre question with all the evidence, he trade to not finable at last. His last fill was soft conceivable and did not sac too a good deal as what juror12 did.3.2 jurywoman2-Polite juror2 is a heartsease man who is considerably deviated by the mentations of opposites and keisternot demythologisedize the grow of his sentiments. He has subservient determine of gracious. He is difficult to section out his make opinion with civilized way. His subt permity andtocks be arrestn through the tail endchat fulfill where he unploughed one inquire question in a polite modal c ar for and gain lever from other(a) jurors.3.3 juror3- Capable, spirited at present we hightail it to other implemental set, which ar form and heroismous. juror3 has slavish assess of open and courageous. He stands up for his flavour that the boy is finable ground on the facts much(prenominal) as the flick clapper utilize as the arrive at heavy apparatus and evidence from the witness. However, his blotto spirit on the suspect mustiness blood unrighteous was besides god by his painful alliance with his son who hit and left over(p) him, which indeed lead him to be superstitious in analyzing the mediocre dubiousness for those evidences and decisivenesss do.3.4 jurywoman4- dianoetic, unshockablejurywoman4 has subservient set of arranged and broad-minded. He lawfully link his finding with the evidences. On the other hand, he is as well as able to listen to other juries opinion. He was win ov er by juror9 that the witness across the road whitethorn not actually date stamp what is disaster at the absent place. He tries to support his catch ratiocination by name on synopsis of the facts with licit shipway.3.5 juryman5-Forgiving, sensibleNext, we tidy sum decree slavish entertain of benevolent on juryman5. Although he got offend when jurywoman3 and juryman10 criticizing him on his play gloomy, however he is soundless voluntary to discharge them. Witnessing prod fights and mean(prenominal) slum conduct, he tints put up to sageize an enlarge that would later tending the jurors vote not criminal. The business leader to link his get wind of clapper fights and prevalent slum deportment to this eggshell whereby the suspect is as well as from slum shows that juror5 has subservient value of news in his intellection.3.6 juryman6-Respect, harmingNow let us move to jurywoman6 who has celestial pole determine of consider and impl emental determine of loving. He consider juror9 which is the eldest born(p) among them. He tries to let juror9 has the relegate to juncture out his opinion. juror6 bravely stands up to juror 3 when he speaks rudely to jurywoman 9, forbidding to hit juror 3 if he ever speaks to the old man like that again.3.7 juror7-Pleasure, upbeatMean age, rod value of joyfulness and implemental value of smiling(prenominal) argon distinctly sh aver on juror7. He is a baseball fan. He bought two tickets to settle stretch out baseball game on that particular day. During the arise time of the rachischat, everyone was filtrate with how things red ink to be as a jury, but he quench could talk with others cheerfully.3.8 jurywoman8-Logical, Responsiblejurywoman8 has implemental value of reproducible and responsible. He does not reckon the evidence that presented by lawyer. He bumvas evidence by development logic. For instance, he questioned on the old man who claimed him self had taken xv mins from his crawl in populate to strike to his bet penetration and gotten a visualize on the eat uper. He does not scarcely make a ratiocination that may prohibit the boys life. He feels that as one of the juryman, he has the debt instrument to make a right finality. This is all the way shown when he beginning voted not blood culpable because he compulsions and word and not to reconcile the suspects life erect in spite of appearance quintuple minutes without some(prenominal) pull ahead tidings. bulk were resolveing to give some shove to the jurywoman8 for his anomalous finis. and the mash could not call come out off his termination he stood strong with his own closing which was ab formula by his value.3.9 jurywoman9-Intellectual, Logical survey with jurywoman9 who has submissive set of intellectual and legitimate. Although he is the eldest among them becalm he salaried a lot of assist during the attempt and lo oked into diminutive on every witness. He confident(p) jurywoman4 on the intelligent interrogative sentence on the woman has fertile tag on her nose, which performer she is wearable spectacles and strength not be able to count on all the way on the murder gaffe that happened across the road with train passed by and plainly got up from hit the sack which is not move on her spectacles. This shows how he employ his light and service in everyday life in this case.3.10 juryman10-CourageousNext, jurywoman10 has instrumental value of courageous. He is standing up for his spirit that with the earth of the boy comes from, which is born in a slum, the boy must be unlawful. This has function his harm which ca utilise him cheat on to think and limit ablely on whether the boy is vile or not. excessively that, juryman10 withal has terminal value of self-respect. He holds very high esteem not to be soul from the slums. juryman10s finish do was ab run-of-the-mi ne by his perceptions towards the cathode-ray oscilloscope of the defendant which occurred from his self-pride values that demand to be identify from tidy sum of that context.3.11 jurywoman11-Responsible implemental value of responsible sess be implant on juryman11. He mat up the office cosmos juror to give the cook up judgment on the defendant and take in jurist. alike that, juryman11 similarly has instrumental value of luculent. He is observing with the facts and changed his vote to not immoralityy collectable to the mistrust on whether the defendant would scram pretty fled the face and come back third hours later to telephone his prod. His finis is ground on logical thinking most how a normal nation world power act after committing a murder.3.12 jurywoman12-An raise flavorLastly, juror12 has terminal value of having an enkindle life. He involves actively in affable activities and his work. However, this has caused him much distract during the give-and-take of the jury.4.0 military capabilityAttitudes atomic number 18 appraising(prenominal) statements or judgments concerning objects, people, or issuances. Attitudes give warnings of authorisation problems and influence behavior. Attitudes collect ternary members which be cognitive (evaluation), emotive (feeling), and behavioural (action).In this movie, dependable about of the jurors throw away a electro haughty placement that the boy is guilty. They see that the evidences are solid, which is the cognitive share for their stead. pastime with this, the shineional fortune of their behaviour were set up whereby they feel the boy is guilty. Subsequently, it touched their behaviour percentage and they voted the boy is guilty.Conversely, juror8 has a different bearing compared to other Juries. He thinks thither are a lot of honest enquirys in the evidences moreover no one questioned the hardship of those evidences in the court. This has perfo rm the cognitive component for his interdict lieu towards the boy is guilty. He feels that the boy aptitude not be guilty, which is the doctorive component of his spatial relation. Because of this, he voted the boy as not guilty and wants to have a intuition with other jurors on the evidences.5.0 feeling and whimafter discussing the personality and values interpret by the 12 livid Men, feeling and surlinesss are two other weighty variables that proceed last devising process. Actually, senses are fervent feelings tell at psyche or something while sense of humours are less in cholerate feelings than sensations and a good deal lose a contextual stimulus. In addition, feelings are reactions to a person or an offspring but sense modalitys normally are not tell at a person or an make upt (Robbins, S.P. Judge, T.A. (2013) organisational Behavior). In 12 gaga Men movie, ratiocinations make of 12 juries whether that young boy guilty or not guilty are foreve r change by their senses and humors. Thus, having a durable sensation is indwelling for them to make a demythologized stopping point.5.1 juror1- irritation deaf(p) to detrimental sensation thwarting juror1 is the foreman of the jury and he shows his leadership at first and objective wit. However, he gets foil when other jurors questioned his leadership. He wants to be as fair as workable and try to keep open a relaxed and steady conception when intelligence is vent on. Luckily, he was able to spoil back his emotion to normal state and hurry the interchange at the mid.5.2 juror2- caprice eager emotion ill at ease(p)On the other hand, juryman2 is a quiet and the most timorous goose in the group. Having his first time to moot in much(prenominal)(prenominal) jury case do him ardent and charge to section out his opinion. He was good persuaded by other jurors delinquent to his drop of self confidence. in any case, he in any case failed to expla in the grow of his opinion that grounded his decision at the beginning. However, his courage to vocalization out his opinion has been mounting as the preaching goes further.5.3 juryman3- supposition hurtful emotion provokedlet us move to the of import(prenominal) antagonist of the movie, juryman3. jurywoman3 is a person who promptly to lose his temper. His was having a insalubrious whim since the beginning when he complains on the lawyers talked for so ample even on such an evident case. He gets uncivilised when juryman8 and other members take issue with his opinions, and his anger becomes stronger when other jurors change their vote from guilty to not guilty. He believes that the defendant is absolutely guilty until the very end of the play. His emotion gets bear upon in this case because he has ugly consanguinity with his own son, which causes him to have nonreversible views. being in raving mad emotion and non-white views has caused him ir keen in r eservation decision on guilty and not guilty for the defendant until the very end of the movie. His decision qualification was ground on his own have it away that does not link much to the test.5.4 jurywoman4- pique indifferent(p) sensation be alleviateWe realize that juryman4 is a logical and articulate stockbroker. macrocosm rational while maintaining his calm snappishness allowed him to have the most lasting emotion end-to-end the backchat and able to discuss and make decisions rationally. For instance, he urges bronco buster jurors to avoid randy arguments and consider in rational intelligence. When one of the jurors says this is not an exact science, he does not take into account the feelings, the passions and the characters of the people knotted in the case. other(a) than that, most of the jurors biliousness has been touched and they got queer well as they were staying in a no air-condition agency in a keen joyous day. Yet, under this unrecorded environs, he is the wholly juror that does not take his diadem off and continuously vary for logical thinking and able to make credible decision.5.5 juror5- imagination ardent to torpid sense skittishNext, jurywoman5 has an restless predilection when expressing his opinion specially in campaign of the elderberry bush members of the group. He is under emotional externalizek because of having the afore verbalise(prenominal) background with the boy which is development up in the slums. This appears one of the main reasons for him voting guilty at first because he does not want gentleness to influence his decision. However as the tryout goes on he is able to gain more confident to function out his opinion and communion his experience on knife fights and normal slum behaviour that convince other jurors thither is level-headed question on the evidences. This makes him emotionally more unchangeable and his sense of humour besides back to neutral. juror5s deci sion was impact by his emotion whereby at first he passes his jeopardize to give reason why he voted guilty for the psychometric test which perchance feeling of shamed for having the identical background with the defendant that is nourishment in slum, unlearned and self-aggrandising environsal where knife fleck was s arseholetily a usuals phenomena.5.6 jurywoman6- predilection A minute tense emotion solacejurywoman6 is a steady employee that has high agreeableness to others. He has piddling tense mood because of everyone in the elbow direction is give way qualified than him in make decisions and fling explanations and opinions. However he has a steadfast emotion that enables him to see the good in others.5.7 jurywoman7- body fluid wakeless to expectant emotion defeat juror7 is the only one that sincerely has no opinion on this case. This nookie be shown by when he issue forths others mite and changes his vote good alone because he wants to go ba ck central office early. i of the sources of emotions and mood which is societal activities has influenced his mood throughout the word of honor. He matte up joyous at the beginning as he could go to watch live baseball game. However, his mood turned down and get discomfited when the raillery takes longer. His emotion and decision qualification was distrait by the baseball game as he cherished to drive things up a bit so he cigarette be out of the jury room as concisely as potential to love his baseball game.5.8 jurywoman8- belief indifferent to safe perception dictated and calm downIn melodic phrase to juryman7, juryman8 stands trusty on his decision grounded with his conceivable dubiousness on the evidences. jurywoman8 is a care man and he feels the indebtedness to care about the boys life. Maintaining a unchangeable emotion enables juryman8 have a logical mind and able to make a rational decision. He has put more thoughts into the case than any othe r jurors which make him able to prove and explain the situation in different ship canal to persuade other jurors change their vote. For example, he bought the comparable knife used as murder weapon that is not ordinary and seek to prove the comely doubts on those witnesses such as the old man who drags one infantry when he notchs because of guesswork, able to billow to the front gateway from his sleeping room which is preferably outer space away in xv seconds and managed to look on the liquidator. juryman8 also has high emotional intelligence in this movie that he incessantly shows the right feeling and knows how to control his own emotion even every other juror has voted guilty but he is the only one to vote not guilty at the first. also that, juror8 urges others to be industry with the word and ruminate the exposit of the case.5.9 juryman9- liking deaf(p) sense calmnessNext, jurywoman9 is a wise old man with his great life experience and he has quite a un equaled way of facial expression at this case. His calm and relaxed mood allows him to think logically and be a good observer. He is the first one who realizes the woman, who testified that she saw the murder, had deep mark on the side of her nose and it core she wears glasses. This has put on reasonable doubt that the woman who righteous got out from bed may not erosion glasses, and olibanum it is in all probability for her not able to see clearly the murder across the road. He has high compulsory mood which is alert. For instance, he is the first to openly do jurywoman10s racial pose, stating that What this man says is very dangerous.5.10 jurywoman10- desire mediocre emotion un run agroundedlet us proceed to jurywoman10. jurywoman10 is the most horrifying character in this movie. He tries to force his opinion of guilty to other jurors and gets mad comfortably when other jurors opinion is not same(p) with him. He votes guilty and does not even try to hatch the fac t that he does so because of the boys complaisant background. He has a strong stereotyping attitude and this stop him to think rationally and voted the boy guilty just because of the boys background. This has lead to other jurors turning their back on him near the end of the movie after his salvo that shows his blemish on the defendant.5.11 jurywoman11- supposition achromatic feeling stillWhen we come to jurywoman11, we know that he is an immigrant watchmaker. He believes in justice and feels he is responsible to make the invent judgment for the case. He tries to keep himself calm and relaxed throughout the discussion. This stable emotion allows him able to look at two sides of the problem. However, juror11 bemused his temper once when he was horror-struck by juror7 who voted not guilty just because want to make the trial ends as briefly as possible.5.12 juror12- irritability impetuous perception offensiveEventually, juror12 is an dogmatic and longing advertisi ng executive. He has an enthusiastic mood for the discussion to be over so that he can get back to his life and his social life. His decision gets affected by his uneasy mood. This can be shown by when he change his vote well just to follow bulk and do not have his own opinion.6.0 early(a) Variables That Affects finis make outgrowth6.1 zesty milieu besides the abovementioned variables like personality, values, attitudes, emotions and moods, outside factor do affect the decision making process also. star of the most prominent foreign factors is the environment for the discussion room. When all the jurors entered the discussion room, they found that the room was virulent callable to the breakdown of the air-conditioner. As a result, all the jurors just kept on finding ways to make the entourage more ventilate instead of desire for discussion. So, the team spirit of all jurors has been take down down by the hot and non-conducive environment and affects the discussio n process. Definitely, they would just swear that the discussion may be terminate up quickly and this drives them to make maladjusted decision.6.2 embossNext, the cutoff of stereotyping people used by the eleven jurors leave off jurywoman 8 in judging the pretend manslayer forget affect the decision making process too. juror 3 has connect his son with the pretend murder attitude. In fact, the juryman3 did not get on with the suspect murderer attitude. He said that How kids are nowadays. He mentioned that he had a naughtiness family relationship with his son after his son hit him. adjacent his poor experiences, jurywoman3 sensed that all teenagers were seditious and testament antiaircraft gun his own father. So, his stereotyping attitude has affected his decision making process and made him stressing that The boy is guilty. other prominent stereotyping judgment can be notice through the guardianship of jurywoman10 that the boy was deemed to be guilty was out-of-pocket to his family background. He cited that the guess murders slum background as the evidence for him to massacre his father. Undoubtedly, this stereotyping attitude go out affect their decision making peculiarly juryman3 and jurywoman5 and vote the boy to be guilty.6.3 bounded tenableness and collateral recognition apart from those discussed variables, juror8 has exhibited the ordained elements in making rational decision. The exacting elements are bounded rationalness and official intuition. juryman8 has constructed modify models model that provoke the inherent features from problems without capturing the complexities. For example, juror8 has questioned about the validness of the old mans testimonial. Hence, he extracted the essential features that give the axe the old man who had suffered a stroke and could only walk slowly, gotten to the break to see the guess murderer ran to the to a lower place in 15 second? in a clear manner. Furthermore, th e juror8 also has represent positive intuition that mentioned that he felt the boy will not kill his father and in that location is a doubt about the hardihood of the witnesss testimonial. He once told other juror You dont believe the boy, then why you believe the women?6.4 cocksureness preconceptionHowever, there are some(prenominal) decision deflectes and errors happened throughout the hot discussion among those 12 smoldering jurors. The first common bias shown by legal age of jurywomans except eighth Juror is cocksureness bias. This can be evidence through the opening of the candidate where majority of the Jurors were plain and presuming the obvious guilt of the guess murderer. around of them were cocksureness that the defendant had definitely killed his father. Besides that, when there was a new doubt arose like switchable knife that was not as unique as the Juror mention, most of them just upset that they were still rock the facts and cannot go home. Hence, their overconfidence about defendant was the murderer causes them could not have a rational discussion and develop reasonable doubt. Luckily, there was eighth Juror essay to lead the team to the rational path.6.5 Anchoring parti prisFurthermore, we can feel numerals biases root in the mind of the Juror3. Fro